Obligation & HBP Visibility

The spreadsheet says HBP. What do the leases say?

Development plans run on lease data that was abstracted years ago and has drifted ever since. Infersoft reads every page of every lease in your position and surfaces the continuous drilling obligations, depth severances, and shut-in provisions that quietly change timing and economics. So your model runs on what the leases actually say.

You're scheduling rigs against a spreadsheet

The development plan assumes the lease data is right. But the abstract was built years ago, often by someone who has since moved on, and every amendment, assignment, and pooling agreement since then is drift the spreadsheet never absorbed. Nobody has re-read the source documents, because nobody has time to re-read the source documents.

Meanwhile the clauses that control timing don't agree with each other. One lease starts the continuous operations clock at rig release, the next at cessation of production, the next defines operations loosely enough to argue about. A clock treated as longer than the lease allows moves a rig line. A depth severance nobody flagged means the producing well holds less than the plan assumes.

Shut-in provisions have caps and conditions. Miss one, and acreage you carried as held by production quietly expires. You usually find out when the top-lease letters start arriving.

Obligation visibility across your entire leasehold position

  • Portfolio-wide obligation extraction: continuous drilling obligations, shut-in provisions, depth severances, retained-acreage clauses, and Pugh clauses pulled from every lease at once, 200+ values per document.
  • HBP risk analysis grounded in the habendum clause itself: see what each producing well actually holds, by tract and by depth, against what the plan assumes it holds.
  • Clock definitions in the source language: how every lease defines commencement, cessation, and continuous operations, side by side, so no clock gets treated as something it isn't.
  • Expiration and deadline tracking built from the documents: primary terms, extension options, shut-in limits, and the obligations that keep acreage held.
  • Exact-language surfacing: the operative clause quoted in full and linked to the page it lives on, ready to hand to counsel or the partner meeting.
  • Structured output your planning team can build on: feed the development model defensible lease data instead of inherited abstracts.
  • Runs on your documents, at your pace: re-run as amendments and assignments come in, so the picture stays current as the position changes.

Every obligation, clock, and expiration on the report links to the exact page and clause it came from, so when the drill schedule moves, you can show exactly why.

Infersoft surfaces every clause that touches timing so your landmen and title attorneys can spend their judgment on the hard calls, with the source language in front of them.

Common questions

See what we find in your documents

Before the next rig line gets committed, find out whether the leases agree with the plan.

Send us 200 leases your team has already reviewed. We'll process them and show you what we find. No commitment, no contract. If we don't surface risks that matter, we'll part as friends.

See It On Your Documents

Let us run a sample on your actual files

What you'll get:

  • ✓ Document processing sample on your actual files
  • ✓ Side-by-side comparison against your existing work
  • ✓ Full report with source-linked findings

No Risk, Real Results

We'll run a proof of concept on your actual documents, free of charge. If we don't find something your team missed, no hard feelings.